HOT BLAST: Alabama in the pages of the Los Angeles Times
Dec 04, 2013 | 1314 views |  0 comments | 27 27 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Justice Sonia Sotomayor (AP photo)
Justice Sonia Sotomayor (AP photo)
"This is the strongest argument I have heard yet against judicial elections, the very existence of which undermine confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Any judge who has to beg future litigants for votes, or who has to promise her constituents that she will employ a particular doctrine or ideology, is tainted. And any defendant whose life or liberty or property depends on the objectivity of a judge pandering to constituents has been deprived of basic fair-trial rights. It's bad enough that judicial elections taint civil justice in states such as Texas. That they taint life-or-death decisions in Alabama is simply deplorable."

That passage comes from an op-ed today in the Los Angeles Times written by Andrew Cohen, who opines about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonya Sotomayor and the prevalence of federal judges in Alabama to ignore life sentence jury recommendations in favor of death sentences.

As Cohen writes, this issue is deplorable. That others around the country and at the Supreme Court are noticing Alabama's failure is notable in itself.

-- Phillip Tutor

Comments must be made through Facebook
No personal attacks
No name-calling
No offensive language
Comments must stay on topic
No infringement of copyrighted material

Friends to Follow

Today's Events

event calendar

post a new event

Wednesday, April 16, 2014