The Star lacks objectivity
by our readers
May 01, 2013 | 2346 views |  0 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Re “Conscience of a billionaire” (H. Brandt Ayers column, April 28):

I find it hard to believe you would castigate someone for use of their money or position just because their position differs from yours. Your newspaper cannot in the slightest way define itself as objective. The bias exudes from each page. You are a liberal and proud of it. You make no bones about it; you even wrote a book on the subject.

When I first moved here, I was told that the local paper was an extension of the liberally biased media. As a matter of fact, I was told the locals refer to it as “The Red Star.” After a year of observance, there is no doubt.

The Tea Party and the supermajority inflame your writers, who seek to sway opinion, not just report the news. Your stance is that members of the Tea Party are extremist because they don’t want more government and want to decrease spending. Your slant is seen in the derogative way you continually refer to the conservative “supermajority” as back-door, dark-of-night cheaters, and not so when there is a liberal piece. Not all liberal activities are above board (Obamacare), but you heap great praise on those efforts, not remembering the famous quote by one of your undoubted heroes, Nancy Pelosi, “But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what’s in it.”

A newspaper is supposed to be objective. Yours is not. Let he without sin cast the first stone.

B.J. Franklin
Oxford
Comments must be made through Facebook
No personal attacks
No name-calling
No offensive language
Comments must stay on topic
No infringement of copyrighted material


Friends to Follow



Most Recommended

The Star lacks objectivity by our readers

Today's Events

event calendar

post a new event

Sunday, April 20, 2014

Marketplace