Speaker's Stand: Don’t dilute Voting Rights Act
by Kevin Alexander Gray
Special to The Star
Apr 05, 2013 | 3040 views |  0 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The U.S. Supreme Court should not damage the Voting Rights Act.

On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Alabama v. Holder about the constitutionality, applicability and relevance of Section 5 of that law. That section required state governments with a history of discrimination to get approval of the Justice Department before they alter their election laws.

While we await the court’s decision, it’s important to note the fallacies in the main arguments that the state of Alabama is making.

“The children of today’s Alabama are not racist and neither is their government,” wrote Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange.

Such a broad statement is hard to justify. The record in the Shelby County case, for instance, demonstrates the continuation of biased practices. Shelby County has had more than 200 discriminatory voting irregularities blocked by Section 5 objections. Shelby’s advocates also pretend that their attack on this law is high minded when in fact it’s about power. It’s about who makes the rules as to who can vote, when they can vote and where they can vote. It’s a fight about turnout — limiting some, enhancing others.

And that fight needs to be put in the present context. In the past two years, we’ve seen 19 states pass measures that make it harder to vote.

The Brennan Center for Justice called these schemes “the biggest rollback in voting rights since the Jim Crow era.” Those measures included voter ID laws that disproportionately impact minority and Democratic Party voters.

In June 2012, in the midst of a presidential election year, Pennsylvania Republican House Majority Leader Mike Turzai let the cat out of the bag when he said at a Republican State Committee meeting that the new voter ID law was “going to allow Gov. Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania.” In 2006, Congress voted overwhelmingly to reauthorize Section 5 for another twenty-five years. The vote was 390-33 in the House and 98-0 in the Senate.

The U.S. Supreme Court should not overturn the will of the people as expressed so overwhelmingly in Congress, and it should not turn back the clock on racial justice in America.

Kevin Alexander Gray is a writer for Progressive Media Project, a source of liberal commentary on domestic and international issues; it is affiliated with The Progressive magazine. Web site: www.progressive.org.
Comments must be made through Facebook
No personal attacks
No name-calling
No offensive language
Comments must stay on topic
No infringement of copyrighted material


Friends to Follow



Most Recommended

Speaker's Stand: Don’t dilute Voting Rights Act by Kevin Alexander Gray
Special to The Star

Today's Events

event calendar

post a new event

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Marketplace